Legal Opinion

Mandl v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1933No. Civil No. 3209PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This is a proceeding by the city of Phoenix to condemn 40 acres of 120., acres of Zali Mandl’s land for a reservoir site to be used in connection with the city’s waterworks system. There is no dispute that the use for which the land is sought is public; that its locality is suitable' and necessary for the city’s purposes. Only the ascertainment of. the value of the 40 acres taken and the damages accruing- to the uncondemned parcel is left for determination. These issues were twice submitted to juries. On the first trial the verdict was for $14,000, but this verdict was set aside and a new…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. St. Louis, Kansas & Arizona Railway Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Stortenbecker v. Iowa Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  3. City of Phoenix v. Consolidated Water CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Viliborghi v. Prescott School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Department of Revenue v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API