Legal Opinion

Schnell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 4, 1929No. 165PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This suit seeks to recover cargo damages to onions shipped from Buenos Aires, Argentine, to New York City, N. Y., on March 3, 1922. The cargo arrived on March 24, 1922, and some of the 2,200 cases, although shipped in good condition, wore damaged when landed.

We need not consider the merits of the controversy as to what caused the damage, or whether the vessel was negligent in the stowage, beeauso the failure to file this suit within three months after giving notice of claim, as required by a condition of the bill of lading, is fatal to its maintenance. Clause 15 of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. BurnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. The PersianaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  5. Leigh Ellis & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. PopeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
  2. Lagerloef Trading Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  3. Government of Indonesia v. the General San MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. Nieto v. the S.S. TinnumDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
  5. Rhodes v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API