Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Siegel

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 11, 1949PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, S.

The decedent’s will named her husband arid her niece as executors. Both qualified as executors. On July 12, 1948, the niece was removed and her letters revoked. She has filed her account which covers a period from June 14, 1947, to July 12, 1948. Objections have been filed by the surviving husband and the special guardian who represents the decedent’s daughter. The will was dated July 13, 1942. The bequests and devises are made to the surviving husband and the niece. The accounting executrix asserts that the value received by each under the language of the will is approximately…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of ByrnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of HardenberghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of EpsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1941
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of FeltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In ref the Accounting of Lawyers Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  2. In re the Accounting of VicedominiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  3. Fish v. FeldzmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API