Legal Opinion

McElvain, Trustee v. Hooton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1936No. Appeal, 277Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an action of assumpsit for the recovery of the proceeds of sale of certain personal property, the title to which was in dispute. The jury found in favor of defendant.

The facts are correctly stated in the opinion of the lower court, Wilson, P. J., overruling motion ex parte plaintiff for judgment n. o. v. from which we quote as follows: “When Jerry Clyde Stokes was adjudicated a bankrupt February 14th, 1934, he had in his possession on his farm certain horses, cows, farm machinery, etc., title to which was claimed by Nell G-. Hooton, a sister of Stokes, and an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. White v. GunnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Renninger v. Spatz, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County1889
  3. Crawford v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Evans v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  5. Northrop v. Finn Construction Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API