Legal Opinion

Tulio v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 24, 1984No. 84-138PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

George Rose Smith, Justice.

This is an action by the appellants, husband and wife, against Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield to recover damages partly for breach of contract and partly for the tort of outrage. In response to a motion by Blue Cross the trial judge entered a partial summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to all tort claims, on the ground that Blue Cross is a benevolent nonprofit corporation that is immune from tort liability. Blue Cross has asked us to dismiss the Tulios’ appeal from the partial summary judgment because it is not a final appealable judgment. We agree and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Independent Insurance Consultants, Inc. v. First State BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. 3-W Lumber Co. v. Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Sherman v. G & H TRANSPORTATION, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Arkhola Sand & Gravel Co. v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Kilcrease v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Murry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API