State v. Ledener
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
HAMITER, Justice.
In the above mentioned some twenty-odd criminal cases judgments were rendered forfeiting the appearance bonds of the respective defendants when the latter failed to appear in accordance with the terms of the surety contracts. (In most of them numerous continuances were granted, on motion of the bonds’ surety, before the forfeitures were decreed.)
Thereafter, A. B. Nunez d/b/a Summit Fidelity and Surety Company, and the Summit Fidelity and Surety Company (surety on all of the bonds), initiated-proceedings against the state in the criminal cases, by way of rules, to show cause…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. United Bonding InsuranceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963
- Frederick v. Popich Marine Construction, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- State v. KunzlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1965
- Mariana v. Eureka Homestead Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. DeLaRoseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- State v. SandozSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- State v. ShiefLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1988
- Cormier v. VidrineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.