In re Catalyst Third-Party Litigation
Superior Court of The Virgin Islands
1Opinion of the Court
WILLOCKS, Administrative Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(November 18, 2015)
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant Akzo Nobel N.V.’s (hereinafter, “Akzo”)1 Motion to Vacate Entry of Default, filed on July 31, 2015. Third-Party Plaintiffs Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation (hereinafter, “HOVIC”) and Amerada Hess Corporation (hereinafter, “Hess”, together with HOVIC, “Third-Party Plaintiffs”) filed an Opposition on August 24, 2015. Akzo did not file a Reply.
On October 8, 2015, the Court being satisfied in the premises, signed Akzo’s Proposed Order granting Akzo’s Motion to Vacate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carson v. Skandia InsuranceDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1982
- Bolling v. Commissioner of EducationSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1977
- Deal Furniture & Appliance, Inc. v. Four Winds Plaza PartnershipDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
- James v. WilliamsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1990
- Carlson v. Metmor Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cotto v. ToliverDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
- Dona Aaron v. Virgin Islands Government Hospital and Health Facilities CorporationSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2021
- Mala v. Barandica JimenezDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022