Legal Opinion

In re Catalyst Third-Party Litigation

Superior Court of The Virgin Islands

Decided November 18, 2015No. Master Docket SX-05-CV-799PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLOCKS, Administrative Judge

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(November 18, 2015)

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant Akzo Nobel N.V.’s (hereinafter, “Akzo”)1 Motion to Vacate Entry of Default, filed on July 31, 2015. Third-Party Plaintiffs Hess Oil Virgin Islands Corporation (hereinafter, “HOVIC”) and Amerada Hess Corporation (hereinafter, “Hess”, together with HOVIC, “Third-Party Plaintiffs”) filed an Opposition on August 24, 2015. Akzo did not file a Reply.

On October 8, 2015, the Court being satisfied in the premises, signed Akzo’s Proposed Order granting Akzo’s Motion to Vacate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Carson v. Skandia InsuranceDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1982
  2. Bolling v. Commissioner of EducationSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1977
  3. Deal Furniture & Appliance, Inc. v. Four Winds Plaza PartnershipDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1997
  4. James v. WilliamsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1990
  5. Carlson v. Metmor Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cotto v. ToliverDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
  2. Dona Aaron v. Virgin Islands Government Hospital and Health Facilities CorporationSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2021
  3. Mala v. Barandica JimenezDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API