Legal Opinion

Urban v. Phy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1928No. 5298PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

March 2, 1923, Andrew Urban and C. A. Coleman entered into a contract in writing wherein Urban agreed to sell and Coleman agreed to purchase an undivided one-half interest in certain oil and gas leases covering 1120 acres of land in the state of Texas. Under the terms of the agreement, the sum of $15,-000 was to be paid by Coleman to Urban in the manner following: “An amount sufficient to meet payment of pay rolls for general expense while-well is being drilled to the depth of 3,000 feet.” It was further agreed that Urban should drill the well to the depth of the Ranger…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pioneer Loan & Land Co. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Lavelle v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Gammel Book Co. v. PaineNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United Brick & Tile Co. v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
  2. Monger Et Ux. v. DimmickOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Futrall v. TriplettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
  4. (PC) Mitchell v. ArchiegaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. City of Owatonna v. Interstate Power Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API