Urban v. Phy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
March 2, 1923, Andrew Urban and C. A. Coleman entered into a contract in writing wherein Urban agreed to sell and Coleman agreed to purchase an undivided one-half interest in certain oil and gas leases covering 1120 acres of land in the state of Texas. Under the terms of the agreement, the sum of $15,-000 was to be paid by Coleman to Urban in the manner following: “An amount sufficient to meet payment of pay rolls for general expense while-well is being drilled to the depth of 3,000 feet.” It was further agreed that Urban should drill the well to the depth of the Ranger…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pioneer Loan & Land Co. v. CowdenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Lavelle v. GordonMontana Supreme Court · 1895
- Gammel Book Co. v. PaineNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Brick & Tile Co. v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Monger Et Ux. v. DimmickOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Futrall v. TriplettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1936
- (PC) Mitchell v. ArchiegaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- City of Owatonna v. Interstate Power Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1936