Legal Opinion

Pruter v. Hopson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 19, 1986No. 09-84-366 CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

Suit for personal injuries and damages arising from an automobile collision, coupled with a count or allegation to recover an award for the loss of the use of appel-lee’s automobile.

The case was submitted on some of the usual grounds of negligence, the jury finding that the appellant was negligent in failing to keep proper lookout, in failing to timely apply her brakes, and following too closely. Each finding of negligence was found to have been a proximate cause of the occurrence. The jury did not find any act of negligence against Hopson. The jury found damages in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Potter v. GarnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Charter Oak Fire Insurance Company v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Page v. Cotton Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loyd Elec. Co., Inc. v. Millett, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  2. Loyd Elec. Co., Inc. v. Millett, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API