Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Masteller

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 26, 1931No. 12,897PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

The question here presented is the correct interpretation of a will in which a power vested in the testator is executed.

Katherine A. Gardner is hereinafter referred to as the mother, her deceased son, Edgar B. Gardner, as decedent, and his daughter, Marguerite Katherine Gardner, as the daughter.

May 13, 1926, the mother created a trust whose indenture provided that the income therefrom should he paid decedent during his lifetime, and that he should have power to dispose of the corpus, amounting to approximately $150,000, by will. December 1, 1927, he executed a will providing for the payment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Hill v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Canfield v. BostwickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  4. Weber v. BryantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  5. In re New York Life Ins. & Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The First National Bank Of Denver v. Denver United States National BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
  2. First National Bank v. Denver United States National BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API