Legal Opinion

In Re Application of Finnegan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1940No. 32,346PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hilton, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court for Itasca county denying the motion of Margaret C. Finnegan for a new trial.

The issues were framed on cross petitions in an action to register a certain deed. The background of the litigation is this. Prior to December 31, 1930, Bernard C. Finnegan was the owner of an undivided interest in certain realty. On February 5, 1932, Finnegan, without joinder of his wife, Margaret C. Finnegan (hereafter called appellant), executed an instrument in the form of a mortgage in favor of Daniel M. Gunn. Gunn died, and his widow, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal National Bank v. GastonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  2. Wellendorf v. WellendorfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hebert v. City of Fifty LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  2. In Re CollierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Finley v. FinleyWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Fingerhut Corp. v. Suburban National BankCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Williams v. EllerbeNew York Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API