Legal Opinion
United States v. Alaska Public Utilities Commission
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided June 5, 1992No. A91-351 CivPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOLLAND, Chief Judge.
MOTION TO DISMISS; CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I
Background
The facts in this case are not in dispute. In 1985 and 1987, the Alaska Public Utilities Commission (APUC) held hearings regarding rate increases proposed by ALAS-COM.
The United States General Services Administration (GSA) has the discretion to intervene in a rate setting hearing when it determines that to do so would be in the taxpayers’ best interests. 1 GSA can in turn delegate the authority to intervene to another governmental entity. 2 The Department of Defense (DoD) maintains military installations…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Alaska Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994