Legal Opinion

State v. Rinkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 1994No. Nos. 92-2425, 92-2584PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICKLE, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Australia Ozell Rin-kins, Jr., was convicted of attempted second-degree murder with a firearm; shooting a firearm at, within, or into a building; and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. The trial court found that Rinkins meets the requirements of section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1991). A finding was made that sentencing under the habitual felony offender (HFO) statute was necessary to protect the public, and Rinkins was adjudicated an HFO and sentenced under that statute. For the primary offense, he received five years in prison (including a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. Burdick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. McKnight v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RinkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. State v. RinkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API