In re Victor I.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*779Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish that the appellant committed acts, which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of attempted assault in the third degree and menacing in the third degree (see Matter of Monay W., 33 AD3d 809, 810 [2006]; Matter of Tiffany M., 24 AD3d 556 [2005]). Moreover, in conducting an independent review of the weight of the evidence (cf CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]), we nevertheless…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Matter of H.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Matter of Jamal G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Tiyana D.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Anthony A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Eljihn C. (Anonymous)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Matter of Juan P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.