State v. Stauffer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Per curiam
G.S. 20-139.1 (a) provides that in any criminal action arising out of acts alleged to have been committed by any person while driving a vehicle under the influence of intoxicating liquor, the amount of alcohol in the person’s blood at the time alleged, as shown by chemical analysis of the person’s breath, shall be admissible in evidence. However, paragraph (b) of this section states expressly, “[I]n no case shall the arresting officer or officers administer such test.”
The purpose of this limitation in the statute is to assure that the test will be fairly and impartially made. An officer, who…
2Cited by12 opinions
- State v. OrtegaWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. RobertsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Arndt v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Connelly v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. RONALD LEE ROACHCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.