Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Southwick

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 30, 2000No. 99-0832/APublished

1ConcurrenceCrawford, Chief Judge

I disagree that admission of the polygraph evidence to support the background cheek of an informant was error. The majority seeks to avoid admission of the “P” word where a party opponent aims in bad faith to draw an inference that can be shown to be untrue based on evidence that a polygraph was administered. Certainly the opponent is allowed to rebut the improper inferences.

The defense theory of the case was to attack the investigation conducted by the Office of Special Investigations (OSI), specifically the reliability of the informant. Of the three controlled buys of drugs from appellant,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. HavensSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. PierceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  4. United States v. William Peter KampilesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. SuzukiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API