Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Boehm, Brown, Rigdon, Seacrest & Fischer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 16, 1996No. 95-2410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAHN, Judge.

The issue in this workers’ compensation ease is whether injuries suffered by appellant, Lois Anne Ryan, arose out of her employment with appellee, Boehm, Brown, Rig-don, Seacrest & Fischer, P.A. (Boehm, Brown). We find that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) erroneously focused upon the question of special hazard in his analysis. We reverse because determination of the issue in this ease depends upon an established exception to the going and coming rule, and does not involve a special hazard analysis.

Before her accident on September 15, 1993, claimant worked as a receptionist…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Doctor's Business Service, Inc. v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  2. Jenkins v. WilsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Securex, Inc. v. CoutoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Fernando Fernandez v. Consolidated Box Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  5. Kash-N-Karry v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Christine Quinn v. CP Franchising, LLC, Cruise Planners etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Deborah Evans v. Holland & Knight And Sentry InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  3. Deborah Evans v. Holland & Knight And Sentry InsuranceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API