Legal Opinion

In Re the Complaint of B & H Towing, Inc.

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided June 15, 2006No. 5:05-cr-00233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GOODWIN, District Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion to enlarge the order restraining suit [Docket 482] and a motion for expedited consideration of the motion to enlarge the order restraining suit [Docket 551] filed by B & H Towing, Inc.; AEP MEMCO, LLC; American Electric Power Company, Inc.; and AEP Resources, Inc. (collectively referred to as “movants”). For the reasons stated herein, the court GRANTS the motion to expedite consideration and DENIES the motion to enlarge the order restraining suit.

This limitation of liability proceeding arises out of a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. CushingSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Paradise Holdings, Inc. v. Paradise Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  3. Wachovia Bank, National Association v. Daniel G. Schmidt III Priag LLC Dgs Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  4. Zapata Haynie Corp. v. Francis Arthur, Margaret Hebert Jackson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. In Re the Complaint of J.E. Brenneman Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. BlainDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API