Legal Opinion
United States v. Cadieux
District Court, D. Maine
Decided January 7, 2004No. CRIM.03-41-B-WPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUPPRESSION HEARING BEFORE DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
WOODCOCK, District Judge.
I. Introduction
On November 5, 2003, the Defendant, David Cadieux moved to suppress certain evidence in this matter. On November 25, 2003, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), this Court referred the Motion to Suppress to United States Magistrate Judge Margaret Kravchuk to conduct hearings and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for disposition. On December 18, 2003, the Defendant moved to withdraw the designation of the Magistrate Judge. The Defendant argues that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bruce Paul Witte v. Justices of the New Hampshire Superior CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Osher v. UNIVERSITY OF MAINE SYSTEMDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2010
- United States v. CadieuxDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- United States v. CadieuxDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2004
- In Re WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2011