Legal Opinion

Gourley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 14, 2002No. 5D02-1208PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

We have received Gourley’s response to our show cause order issued pursuant to State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999) (court can restrict future pro se pleadings if it first provides a pro se litigant notice and an opportunity to respond). Finding no merit to the response, and because Gourley has repeatedly abused the judicial system in this regard, we think he qualifies for this court’s “Enough is enough” rule. See, e.g., Werts v. State, 722 So.2d 982 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Davis v. State, 705 So.2d 133, 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409, 410-11 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).

Accor…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Isley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Werts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. Gourley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Medberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API