Legal Opinion

Dykstra v. Huizinga

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1961No. Docket 44, Calendar 48,704PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiffs, owners of lots in a certain subdivision in the city of Grand Rapids, filed suit seeking an injunction to restrain defendants from the commercial development of lot 20 in said subdivision, owned by defendants Huizingas.

Defendants Huizingas originally owned the tract of land which was subdivided and platted. On December 30, 1955, Cornelius and Hilda Huizinga entered into a land contract with Willard Holwerda (plaintiff herein) and Nellie Holwerda in which certain lots were to be conveyed to them. On the same day they executed another contract with John Newhof & Sons covering other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Schoenfield v. VeenboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Progressive Mutual Insurance v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Kidder v. CollumMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Bogdanski v. City of WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API