Legal Opinion
California Packing Corp. v. Halferty
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 1924No. Nos. 1609-1611PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMYTH, Chief Justice.
These are opposition proceedings, in each of which Halferty applied for the registration of a trade-mark to be used on canned salmon. The mark in No. 1609 consisted of the words “Gold Band” and a band of gold extending from one end to the other of the label; in No. 1610, of the words “Silver Band” and a silver band extending like the gold band; and in No. 1611, of the words “White Band” and a band of white of the same length as the other bands. Applicant commenced the use of his brands about June, 1921. , Opposer bases its contention on two registered marks; one…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Florence Mfg. Co. v. J. C. Dowd & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- William Waltke & Co. v. Geo. H. Schafer & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. Decatur Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- California Packing Corp. v. Price-Booker Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
- Arrow Distilleries, Inc. v. Globe Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Soy Food Mills, Inc. v. Pillsbury Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Di Santo v. GuarneriCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927
- Four Roses Products Co. v. Small Grain Distilling & Drug Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.