Legal Opinion

Walters v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 23, 1931No. 6 Div. 3PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

The offense charged in this ease is robbery; the corpus delicti was fully proven by the evidence, and as to this there was no dispute or conflict.

The principal state witness was one G. W. Jackson, named in the indictment as the injured party. He testified in substance as follows: “My name is G. W. Jackson; I am a druggist; my place of business is 1530 — 11th, Avenue, North, Birmingham, Alabama. On or about the Tth, day of June, 192T, I think the records show, I lost some money; it was about ten thirty at night. The clerk, Irby Trainum, was present at the time; I understand he is in California…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  2. Brown v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Buice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API