Legal Opinion

Kurt v. Lanyon

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 7, 1905No. 14,273PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Allen district court; OSCAR Foust, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J.:

This controversy arose over the interpretation and construction of a certain writing or writings. The plaintiff claimed that a certain instrument, which was an encumbrance upon lands then owned by him, was an oil-and-gas lease, and that it was void, first, for want of consideration; second, for lack of mutuality; and, third, that it had been abandoned by the lessee. He brought this suit to have the instrument set aside and canceled. Judgment was for defendant.

It appears that prior to the execution of this instrument the title to the land…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Jack v. HookerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Shaffer v. Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  3. Skinner v. SkinnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Mound City Brick & Gas Co. v. Goodspeed Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. MacLorinan v. FinleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API