United States v. Barowsky

WYZANSKI, District Judge.

This case is before me on plaintiff’s motion for confirmation of the master’s report and defendant’s objections to that report.

Defendant’s counsel stated in open court that the only question he intended to raise was whether plaintiff’s purported acceptance so varied from defendant’s offer that there was no contract. Defendant’s precise point is that he offered to buy boxes located at Bridgeport on the basis “F.O.B. Bridgeport”, whereas the Government replied that it “will * * * accept * * * for boxes * * * located at Stratford * * * and Bridgeport.”

From the findings…