Legal Opinion

Hensel v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 15, 1915No. 1419PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7566 (T. D. 34458).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The protests in this case cover certain mining machinery consisting of rock drills and bar hoists and their respective parts. Duty was levied thereon at 45 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 199 of the tariff act of 1909 as manufactures of metal. The competing paragraph relied upon is paragraph 197 of the same act, and the only claim urged in this court is that the merchandise is dutiable under the provision for “all steam engines.”

Appellants in their brief state that “ the decision of the board in effect is that the ultimate use or method of operation of the article after it arrives in this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Seeberger v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API