Legal Opinion

Samuel v. Samuel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 31, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Grosvenor, J.), dated September 6, 2005, which granted the father’s petition for visitation with the parties’ children.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Kings County, for further proceedings.

Family Court Act § 262 (a) grants a person in certain proceed*1011ings the right to counsel. Under the statute, the Family Court must “advise such person before proceeding that he or…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gilbert Frank Corp. v. Federal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Werking v. Amity Estates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  3. Wilson v. BennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re ChildrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Alexander v. MaharajAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bader v. HazzisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Brown v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Cohen v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 2011
  4. WRIGHT, ALICIA A. v. WALKER, AMY E.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. BROWN, PAMELA A. v. PATTERSON, RALPHAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API