Legal Opinion
United States of America, Harold Omar Mack
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided January 27, 1982No. 81-1362PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal the appellant United States argues that the district court erred in applying the sanctions of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161-3174 (Supp.1981) (the Act), to dismiss a four-count indictment to which the defendant pleaded not guilty following a mandate of this court vacating his original conviction and sentence and affording him the opportunity to plead anew. Specifically, the Government raises two closely related fundamental questions, whether the district court erred in holding that the time limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(i) and the dismissal sanction…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harold Omar Mack v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Glen HermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Louis GillissCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Edward StulgaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Pablo CarreonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Mohammad Reza MehrmaneshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. John Charles Richard MentzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. RushCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, Inc., AKA Sears, AKA Sears & RoebuckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Freeman D. Carter, A/K/A Daniel Brady, James Patrick Daly, and William CarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.