Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wilma Williams v. Kfc National Management Company

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 9, 2004No. Docket 03-7309Published

1ConcurrenceCalabresi, Circuit Judge

This case presents a simple fact pattern' — a slip-and-fall on a sidewalk outside a restaurant — but implicates complex, and longstanding, issues concerning circumstantial evidence. With that in mind, while I readily concur in the opinion of the Court, I write separately to provide some analysis on the key substantive question underlying this appeal: What does the law of torts tell us about the amount and type of circumstantial evidence that plaintiffs must adduce, in different circumstances, in order to reach a jury?

I

A review of the doctrine reveals three (closely related) areas in which…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Griffen v. . ManiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API