Legal Opinion

Batsell v. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 13, 1893No. 4PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Tried below before Hon. P. B. Muse.

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

Appellant brought this suit against appellee, to recover $1900, paid to appellee on an executory contract, the conditions of which, it is alleged, the appellee failed to perform.

The appellant, among others, became a party to a subscription contract, by which each became liable for the payment of the amount only opposite his name, conditioned that the appellee would construct, equip, and maintain a railroad from Mount Pleasant to Sherman. By the terms of said instrument, a committee was designated and empowered to make a •contract, in conformity with the terms of said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. WelchTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Weis v. DevlinTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Hillyard v. Crabtree's Adm'rTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Darnell v. LyonTexas Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Closner v. ChapinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Society v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Metzler Bros. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Hudson v. ArcherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Society v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API