Legal Opinion

Carolina Baking Co. v. Geilfuss

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 5, 1933No. 13614PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Bonham.

A. Geilfuss was in business in Spartanburg operating a bakery in his own name, and also as Dixie Cake Company, a corporation of which he was sole owner. He became heavily indebted'to Carolina National Bank and Dollar Savings Bank, both of Spartanburg, S. C., to general trade creditors, and was indebted to Life Insurance Company of Virginia, which last-named indebtedness was secured by mortgage. It appearing probable that Geilfuss must go into bankruptcy, negotiations were opened which culminated in Geilfuss executing to R. B.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barfield v. BarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  2. Middleton v. Denmark Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
  3. Porter v. J. H. Hydrick Realty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  4. Barnwell v. MarionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1902
  5. Gray v. Marion County Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Miller, State Bd. of Bk. ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Mutual Building & Loan Ass'n of Sumter v. HewsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  3. Walker v. HannonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Carolina Baking Co. v. GeilfussSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Claffy v. Mechanics Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API