Teufel ex rel. Long v. Rowan
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 82, Oct. T., 1896, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. No. 3, Allegheny Co., Nov. T\, 1895, No. 107, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report. Exceptions to auditor’s report. Before Kennedy, P. J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Sterrett,
The learned auditor, charged with the distribution of the fund raised by the sheriff’s sale of the defendant’s personal property, reported in substance the following findings of fact, inter alia:
That the defendant, John Rowan, leased from Jacob Kaufman et al., the Central Hotel for five years from April 1, 1892, at a rental varying in amount each year. The rent for the third year, commencing April 1, 1895, was $13,000, payable in *410advance on the first of each month. By a subsequent and “ auxiliary agreement,” all the rent reserved in the lease became…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Platt, Barber & Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Huling v. DrexellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
- Atkinson v. WaltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
3Cited by9 opinions
- Blue Ridge Metal Manufacturing Co. v. ProctorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Corona Coal & Coke Co. v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- In re Keith Gara Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
- Steinman v. Lacharty Hotels Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Bisk Candy Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.