Legal Opinion
Reno v. Western Cab Company
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 21, 2024No. 2:18-cv-00840Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 MICHAEL RENO, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-00840-APG-BNW 5 Plaintiffs, ORDER 6 v. 7 WESTERN CAB COMPANY, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Sanctions based on Defendant Western Cab’s 11 failure to appear for its 30(b)(6) deposition. ECF No. 371. As relevant to this Order, Plaintiffs 12 seek sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2) for violating the Court’s discovery 13 orders. Id.1 They ask the Court to preclude Western Cab from contesting the accuracy of records, 14 contesting the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Valley Engineers Inc. v. Electric Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Navellier v. SlettenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Clair W. BURKE, Appellee, v. DEERE & COMPANY, A/K/A John Deere Company, a Delaware Corporation, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.