Legal Opinion
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 26, 1990No. 86 Civ. 6066 (RLC)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.
The facts of this case are fully set out in the court’s earlier opinion, reported as Railway Labor Executives’ Association v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson Corp., 695 F.Supp. 124 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (Carter, J.), with which familiarity is assumed. In that opinion, the court found that the decision by Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company (“Metro-North”) to require urinalysis drug screening at its employees’ periodic and return-to-duty physical examinations gave rise to a “major dispute” under the Railway Labor Act (“RLA”). 45 U.S.C. §§ 151-188. 1 Consequently,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Joseph Toussaint, Plaintiffs/appellees/cross-Appellants v. Daniel McCarthy Defendants/appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Milam v. HerrlinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- John Hancock Property & Casualty Insurance v. Universale Reinsurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. DiamondDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- JLM Couture, Inc. v. GutmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- The Professional Airline Flight Control Association v. Spirit Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2022