Legal Opinion
Hallman v. Gross
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 21, 1948No. [No. 147, October Term, 1947.]PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrason, J.
The defendants in this case (appellants) appeal from from two orders passed by the chancellor, one dated October 1, 1947, and one the 24th day of October, 1947, which required the defendants to produce certain documents alleged and thought to be in the possession of the defendants, to be used by the plaintiffs in the examination of the defendants, under Discovery Rule 4 of General Rules of Practice and Procedure, 1947 Supplement Annotated Code, page 2038.
The bill of complaint, in substance, charges: That in 1944 Stephen Frank Gross and Henry T. Dietz, plaintiffs below (appellees) together…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kenealy v. Texas Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Anderson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Eastern States Corp. v. EislerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Piest v. Tide Water Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
3Cited by18 opinions
- Baltimore Transit Co. v. MezzanottiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Snowhite v. State, Use of TennantCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Stein v. Overlook Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Bartell v. BartellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Barnes v. LednumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.