Legal Opinion

House v. BJK Industries

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2003No. 2002-SC-0429-WCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Having concluded that the claimant’s post-award decrease in wage-earning capacity was due to economic factors rather than to the effects of his compensable injury, the Court of Appeals determined that he was not entitled to an increased award at reopening. Thus, it reversed a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) decision that had affirmed the increased award. We are persuaded, however, that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) reasonably concluded from the evidence that the effects of the claimant’s injury were a substantial factor in causing his loss of earning capacity.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Osborne v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  3. Peabody Coal Co. v. GossettKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Continental Air Filter Co. v. BlairKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gro-Green Chemical Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Epi Corporation v. Jennifer BolingKentucky Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API