House v. BJK Industries
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Having concluded that the claimant’s post-award decrease in wage-earning capacity was due to economic factors rather than to the effects of his compensable injury, the Court of Appeals determined that he was not entitled to an increased award at reopening. Thus, it reversed a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) decision that had affirmed the increased award. We are persuaded, however, that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) reasonably concluded from the evidence that the effects of the claimant’s injury were a substantial factor in causing his loss of earning capacity.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
- Osborne v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Peabody Coal Co. v. GossettKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Continental Air Filter Co. v. BlairKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Gro-Green Chemical Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
3Cited by1 opinion
- Epi Corporation v. Jennifer BolingKentucky Supreme Court · 2014