Legal Opinion
In Re Harding
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.
Decided February 8, 2010No. 19-11503PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) Denying Debtor’s Amended Motion to Separately Classify Student Loan [DE 46]; and (2) Enjoining Student Loan Creditor from Charging Late Fees, Penalties, or Collection Fees Resulting from Pro Rata Chapter 13 Plan Distributions Being Less Than Minimum Monthly Payments Required by Contract
JOHN K OLSON, Bankruptcy Judge.
On November 9, 2009, Debtor Nadeen S. Harding filed an Amended Motion to Separately Classify Student Loan Payments [DE 46] in which she seeks to discriminate in favor of nondischargeable student loan debt at the expense of other nonpriority general unsecured creditors.…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Mass.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re WarkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- In re PrachtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2012
- In Re AbaunzaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2011
- In Re BoscaccyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2010
- In Re EdmondsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.