Legal Opinion

Chatham Investment Co. v. Sunshine Investments, Inc.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 25, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

In this ease appellant filed bill to foreclose mortgage.

M. E. Gruber and M. E. Gruber, Incorporated, were made parties defendant for that as it was alleged M. E. Gruber had hy the terms of a sealed, written instrument assumed and promised to pay the indebtedness secured by the mortgage, and that M. E. Gruber, Incorporated, had likewise assumed and promised to pay the same indebtedness.

Neither the alleged written instrument by which either of the defendants M. E. Gruber or M. E. Gruber, Incorporated, became bound to pay the obligation was attached to or made a part of the bill of complaint.

M.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lykes v. BeauchampSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. Indian River Manufacturing Co. v. WootenSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Hanover Fire Insurance v. HiersSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  4. Zewadski v. DyalSupreme Court of Florida · 1919

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stadler v. Cherry Hill Developers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  2. City of Miami v. Miami Transit CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957
  3. Davis v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Strong v. ClaySupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  5. Welch v. BryantMississippi Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API