Legal Opinion

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 23, 1980No. Appeal, No. 2326 C.D. 1979PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

This is an appeal by Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) from an order adopted on October 4, *5781979, by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) directing Conrail to bear the costs incurred for repair of the bridge carrying Byberry Eoad over and above the grade of Conrail tracks in the City of Philadelphia (City), to reimburse the City for the costs it expended in emergency work, and to maintain the bridge in the future.

This case arose as a result of a PUC order adopted on its own motion on February 24, 1978, to investigate the structural adequacy and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Commonwealth v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. National Railroad Passenger v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. City of Chester v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. D & H Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API