Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Application of Dalton

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1951No. Patent Appeal 5749Published

1ConcurrenceGarrett, Chief Judge

(specially concurring) .

This specially concurring opinion is written merely to elaborate what is said in the majority opinion relative to the “affidavit question,” which is referred to also in the dissenting opinion.

Former Rule 138 of the Patent Office, 35 U.S.C.A. Appendix, which was in effect at the time the Board of Appeals passed upon the case, read: “138. Affidavits or exhibits submitted after the case has been appealed will not be admitted without remanding the application to the Primary Examiner for reconsideration; but the appellate tribunal may in their discretion refuse to remand…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re AyersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  2. Application of RipperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
  3. In re HutchisonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  4. Application of PatrickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API