Legal Opinion

Lanquist v. Grossman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 5, 1935No. Gen. No. 37,902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sullivan

Plaintiff, Russel E. Lanquist, sued defendants on their alleged contract of guaranty in a first class action in the municipal court to recover $5,220, principal and interest claimed to be due on a promissory note. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and finding and judgment rendered against plaintiff.

December 4, 1934, we denied defendants’ motion theretofore made to dismiss plaintiff’s appeal. We arc asked now to reconsider our ruling on their motion to dismiss this appeal, to vacate our order denying said motion and to allow their motion to dismiss the appeal at this time.

The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Corrigan v. Von Schill College of Chiropody & Pedic SurgeryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Continental Paper Grading Co. v. Howard T. Fisher & Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Harris v. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1939
  3. Atlas Finishing Co. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  4. Gholston v. TerrellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  5. Chicago Housing Authority v. FrankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API