Wetzel v. Schaefer
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MIZE, District Judge.
Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein and assigns four grounds for his contention, the first three of which are to the effect that appellant has failed to file a complete transcript of the record within the time allowed by statute and has failed to comply with Rule 23 of this court and Rule 13 of the United States Supreme Court, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 354. The fourth ground challenges the right of appellant to prosecute the appeal in forma pauperis. If this motion were sustained on this fourth ground, we would permit the appellant to file a bond,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reiss v. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- In Re MakiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
- West Kentucky Coal Co. v. DillmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Wetzel v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
3Cited by3 opinions
- C. B. Porterfield and Morris Margulis, Intervenors v. L. M. Gerstel, Receiver of Metal Extrusions, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Trust Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Wetzel v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947