Legal Opinion

Wetzel v. Schaefer

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 26, 1941No. 9884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MIZE, District Judge.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal herein and assigns four grounds for his contention, the first three of which are to the effect that appellant has failed to file a complete transcript of the record within the time allowed by statute and has failed to comply with Rule 23 of this court and Rule 13 of the United States Supreme Court, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 354. The fourth ground challenges the right of appellant to prosecute the appeal in forma pauperis. If this motion were sustained on this fourth ground, we would permit the appellant to file a bond,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reiss v. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  2. In Re MakiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  3. West Kentucky Coal Co. v. DillmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Wetzel v. SchaeferSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. B. Porterfield and Morris Margulis, Intervenors v. L. M. Gerstel, Receiver of Metal Extrusions, Inc., BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Trust Co. v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Wetzel v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API