Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Fincher

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided February 27, 2002No. 10-00-243-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOM GRAY, Justice.

This is a restricted appeal. Jimmie Campbell and Michael Fincher were involved in a traffic accident in McLennan County, Texas. Fincher sued Campbell. Campbell did not file an answer. The trial court entered a default judgment against Campbell. Almost four months later, Campbell filed a notice of appeal alleging that neither he nor counsel participated in the hearing that resulted in the judgment. We affirm.

Restricted Appeal

The restricted appeal replaced the former writ of error practice when the Supreme Court adopted the current appellate rules in 1997. See…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Norman Communications v. Texas Eastman Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of Houston v. Arney, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
  3. Bloom v. Bloom, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1989
  4. Long v. McDermott, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. In the Interest of E.K.N.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Gutierrez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Coronado v. Norman, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
  3. Asset Protection & Security Services, L.P. v. Virginia Armijo, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2019
  4. Shari Fazio v. Sharyl Newman, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2003
  5. Steinke v. Mann, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API