Legal Opinion
Great Pines Water Co., Inc. v. Liqui-Box Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 29, 2000No. 98-20198PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. EUGENE DAVIS, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Liqui-Box Corporation (“Li-qui-Box”) challenges the damage portion of the judgment entered against it following a jury trial. Liqui-Box’s principal argument is that the lost profit and compensatory damage elements of the lump sum award are not supported by sufficient evidence. Our review of the record leads us to agree that Appellee Great Pines Water Company (“Great Pines”) failed to produce sufficient evidence to establish the number of Great Pines customers who canceled service due to Liqui-Box’s defective products. Because this fact was essential to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Formosa Plastics Corp. USA v. Presidio Engineers and Contractors, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Holt Atherton Industries, Inc. v. HeineTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Szczepanik v. First Southern Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Debbie Floyd v. Larry Laws, and City of Sherwood, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd. v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sulzer Carbomedics, Inc. v. Oregon Cardio-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Kenneth FairleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Rutland v. MullenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
- Donna Flournoy v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Government of Virgin Islands v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.