Legal Opinion

Richburg v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided November 14, 1947No. Civ. A. No. 2186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiff sued the insurer alone of Jesse R. Madden, the above defendant, for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligent operation of an automobile. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint for the reason that it does not state *443a cause of action or a claim on which relief can be granted. The basic contention is that Act No. 55 of the State Legislature of 1930, giving the right to sue the insurer alone in such cases, does not apply in the Federal Courts. The reasons stated are as follows:(1) That the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Anderson v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1940
  3. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Libby v. RussellDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API