Legal Opinion · Dissent

D.C. v. D.C.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 1994No. 2-92-0785Published

1Dissent

PRESIDING JUSTICE INGLIS,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent.

By holding that the escape rule applies only in felony-murder cases, the majority disregards a decade of established case law beginning with People v. Mumford (1979), 70 Ill. App. 3d 395, and culminating in People v. House (1992), 232 Ill. App. 3d 309. "[F]or purposes of determining legal accountability, the crime is not completed until the offender has escaped from the scene.” (People v. Johnson (1991), 220 Ill. App. 3d 550, 555.) Although, as the majority notes, this rule derives from a felony-murder case, there is no Illinois…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. The PEOPLE v. ZierlionIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. People v. GilAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. People v. MumfordAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. HouseAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API