Legal Opinion

Lazarus v. Rosen Bros. Neckwear Corp.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided December 27, 1955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBaer, J.

Motions numbered 19 and 21 have been consolidated. The plaintiff’s notice of examination called for the production of the books, records and papers referred to therein. The defendant failed and refused to produce certain of them. The records in controversy were relevant and germane to the subject of the examination in the light of the written contract between the parties. That the plaintiff did not serve a subpoena with his notice of examination does not excuse the defendant. The amendment to section 296 of the Civil Practice Act which was effected by chapter 497 of the Laws of 1955, on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marie Dorros, Inc. v. Dorros Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Stein v. Daniels & Kennedy, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Revyuk v. DunbarNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API