Legal Opinion

State v. Vaillancourt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant having entered a plea of not guilty, it was necessary for the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the offense charged in the bill of indictment. State v. Mason, 268 N.C. 423, 150 S.E. 2d 753. One of these was the fact that at the time of the escape the defendant was serving a sentence imposed upon conviction of a felony. State v. Stallings, 267 N.C. 405, 148 S.E. 2d 252. While a properly certified copy of the commitment, under which the defendant was in custody at the time of the escape, is competent evidence to show the lawfulness of the custody and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. State v. StallingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API