Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Harriel
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.
The appellee, Nathan Harriel, was plaintiff in the court below and brought suit against the appellant for personal injuries, and recovered a judgment for one thousand dollars, from which this appeal is prosecuted.
The declaration alleged that the appellant was engaged in the sawmill business and used a skidder on which the appellee was employed to work, under the supervision of the skidder foreman, as drum operator, for the purpose of drawing logs from the woods to- the appellant’s private logging tracks, the appellant having a private logging railroad line to carry logs to its mill. It was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- New Deemer Mfg. Co. v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
- Hunter v. Ingram-Day Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1916
- J. J. Newman Lumber Co. v. IrvingMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
- Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
- Ellis v. Bear Creek Mill Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. Aeroland Oil CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1944
- Eastman v. CaldwellMississippi Supreme Court · 1937