Legal Opinion

Edward Hines Lumber Co. v. Harriel

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1934No. 31423PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, P. J.

The appellee, Nathan Harriel, was plaintiff in the court below and brought suit against the appellant for personal injuries, and recovered a judgment for one thousand dollars, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

The declaration alleged that the appellant was engaged in the sawmill business and used a skidder on which the appellee was employed to work, under the supervision of the skidder foreman, as drum operator, for the purpose of drawing logs from the woods to- the appellant’s private logging tracks, the appellant having a private logging railroad line to carry logs to its mill. It was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. New Deemer Mfg. Co. v. AlexanderMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hunter v. Ingram-Day Lumber Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1916
  3. J. J. Newman Lumber Co. v. IrvingMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Ellis v. Bear Creek Mill Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Aeroland Oil CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  2. Eastman v. CaldwellMississippi Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API