Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Lugoff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1928No. 26,670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for an accounting for alleged secret profits of a joint adventure. After a decision for plaintiff, defendants Gall and Wells appeal from an order denying their motion for amended findings and in part the alternative of a new trial. Defendant Lugoff did not join in that motion and is not a party to the appeal.

Plaintiff sues ostensibly on behalf of himself and the other members of a pool, which included 20 other Duluth gentlemen, among them defendants Gall and Wells. It was organized under a written contract January 15, 1925, to market a block of the stock of the Carnegie Lead & Zinc…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Burbank v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Church v. OdellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  4. Densmore Oil Co. v. DensmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Stenian v. TashjianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Straus v. StrausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API